
complex number 4 marks(SAQ)
Note: This section is of mathematical interest and students should be encouraged to read it. In particular, it is helpful for them to understand why the complex numbers are not really any more mathematically abstract than the reals. However, knowledge of this section is not required by the current intermediate syllabus and is not necessary for an understanding of how to use complex numbers to solve equations.
The set of complex numbers is a number system, just like the set of reals or the set of integers. Like the reals or even the integers, they were developed to close a mathematical ‘gap’ in another number system. So what is this mathematical gap?
Consider the linear equation . This has one solution in the real numbers: .
Now consider the equation . Algebraic manipulation shows that this is equivalent to solving . Since squares of real numbers are nonnegative we would say that this has ‘no real solutions’.
Consider finally a general quadratic equation . To solve this, we use the quadratic formula, which gives us where is the discriminant. If the discriminant is negative, we would again say that the equation has ‘no real solutions’.What has happened here is that squares of real numbers are always nonnegative. We cannot square a real number and get a negative number. To close this gap, we extend the reals to a number system where squares can also be negative. The easiest way to achieve this is to introduce some number whose square is . This number , is defined by . Then if we want to solve where is some positive real, we get , or . If we put all numbers of the form (where is real) in our new number system, we can now solve any quadratic equation with real coefficients. Numbers of the form ( real) are known as ‘imaginary numbers’.
In order to turn our set of numbers into a proper number system, we want to introduce some operations so that we can do things with these numbers. The two most fundamental operations of any set (or field) of numbers are addition () and multiplication (). We will define these operations properly later. For now, all you need to know is that if you take two real numbers and add them using complex addition, the result is the same as if you added them using real addition. Similarly, if you take two real numbers and multiply them using complex multiplication, the result is the same as if you multiplied them using real multiplication.
Since the real numbers are closed under addition () and multiplication (), we want this to hold true for our new number system too. What this means is that if we take any two numbers in the number system (e.g. and ), we want their sum to be in the number system (closure under addition).We also want their product () to be in the number system (closure under multiplication). If we take the closure of the real and imaginary numbers, we get all numbers of the form ( , real) must be in the new number system. A little bit of complex number arithmetic shows that this is enough to guarantee closure under addition and multiplication.
So now we have a new set of numbers, the complex numbers , where each complex number can be written in the form (where , are real and ). The set of complex numbers is closed under addition and multiplication. Furthermore, each real number is in the set of complex numbers, , so that the real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers (see Figure 1). Finally, any quadratic equation with real coefficients, or even any polynomial with real coefficients, has solutions that can be represented as complex numbers.
Side note: Indeed what makes the complex numbers so powerful is that all degree n polynomials with complex coefficients have n (not necessarily distinct) complex roots. We say that is ‘algebraically closed’.Figure 1:
This figure shows that the naturals are a subset of the integers, which are a subset of the rationals, which are a subset of the reals, which are a subset of the complex numbers. The set of numbers in the reals which are not rationals are known as the irrationals.
Students should note that whilst the real numbers and the imaginary numbers are both subsets of the complex numbers, there are complex numbers (such as ) which are neither real nor imaginary.Arithmetic of Complex Numbers
Recall that every complex number is the sum of a real number and imaginary number. We say that has a real part, , and an imaginary part, . If , these are given by:
In the above notation, notice how much a complex number looks like a surd (e.g. compare and ). The only difference is that the number under the square root sign is negative.In fact, when it comes to arithmetic, complex numbers can be treated like surds. This concept is useful when remembering how to add, subtract, multiply or divide complex numbers. Pretend that your complex number is a surd, perform the same operations and everything should work out.
Addition and Subtraction
In order to add two complex numbers, their real and imaginary parts should be added separately. In order to subtract two complex numbers, their real and imaginary parts should be subtracted separately.
Note: Adding is the same as subtracting , and subtracting \ is the same as adding .Addition: Or
Subtraction:
Or
Example 1
If the complex numbers and are given by and , determine:
a)
b)
Solution 1
a)
b)
Notice that this is just like adding or subtracting surds:
Multiplication of Complex Numbers
In order to multiply two complex numbers, each number should be treated like a surd and the FOIL method applied as appropriate. Students should note that just as the square of the irrational part of a surd gives a rational number, the square of an imaginary number gives a real number.
Example 2
If the complex numbers and are given by and , determine .
Solution 2
(applying FOIL)
(collecting ‘like’ terms: real and imaginary parts)Complex Conjugates and their Properties

What are Complex Numbers and why do we need them?

For a given complex number , its complex conjugate is denoted by and is given by:
Students are required to know how to determine the complex conjugate of a given complex number. The following example illustrates how this is done.
Example 3
(HSC 1994 Question 2aii)
Let , where and are real.Find in the form , where and are real.Solution 3
First, express the complex number under the bar as the sum of its real and imaginary components:
To find the conjugate, replace the imaginary component with its negative counterpart
Complex conjugates have a number of nice properties:
Students will eventually be required to prove all these properties (note that proving the 4^{th} and 6^{th} properties requires reading ahead to the next few section). The next example illustrates how one would go about proving such results.
Example 4
For any complex numbers and , prove that .
Solution 4
Let ,
Division of Complex Numbers
One nice thing about complex conjugates is that if a complex number is multiplied with its complex conjugate, the result is a real number:
Notice how this is analogous to multiplying a surd with its conjugate surd, where the result is a rational number.
This result becomes very useful when taking the reciprocals of complex numbers. Just as multiplying the top and bottom of a surd fraction by the conjugate surd of the denominator rationalises the denominator, multiplying top and bottom of a complex number fraction by the complex conjugate of the denominator makes the denominator real.
Similarly, when dividing by a complex number , simply multiply top and bottom by the complex conjugate of and then apply complex multiplication to the numerator.
Example 5
If the complex numbers and are given by and , determine .
Solution 5
Equality of Complex Numbers
Two complex numbers are equal if and only if their real parts are equal and their imaginary parts are equal.
if and only if
AND
Finding the Square Roots of Real and Complex Numbers
To determine the square root of a real number :
 If , its square roots are the real numbers and .
 If , and are real numbers. Therefore and are imaginary numbers and , . Therefore the square roots of are .
Determining the square root of a complex number is a slightly more complicated process. One way to think about it is that it is equivalent to determining which complex numbers can be squared to give . That is, find all real such that . The general method is as follows:
 Use complex multiplication to obtain the real and imaginary parts of the LHS.
 Since two complex numbers are equal if and only if their real and imaginary parts are equal, equate the real and imaginary parts of the LHS and RHS to obtain two simultaneous equations:
 Comparing real parts gives
 Comparing imaginary parts gives
 Solve for and , either by inspection or by substitution.
The following example demonstrates how both variants of the above method can be used to determine the square roots of a complex number.
Example 6
Find all complex solutions to the equation
Solution 6
Let the solutions be of the form .
Then
so that and .
Variant 1:
By inspection, , satisfies these simultaneous equations
Checking:
and so that is a solution
and so that is a solution
Variant 2:
From the second equation, so that .
Substituting into the first equation yields
so that and or .
Since the second equation has no real solutions, and .
Corresponding y can be determined using so that .
Therefore and are the solutions to the given equation.
Note that the first method, solve by inspection, is a lot shorter and tidier than the second method. Thus if students are able to determine the solutions to the two simultaneous equations by inspection, they are encouraged to use this method. Just to safe, however, they should always include a few lines of checking.
The second method has the advantage of providing a series of steps which is guaranteed to yield an answer. If a student cannot easily determine the answer by inspection they should proceed to solve the equations algebraically.
Students should note that since two simultaneous equations in two variables ( and ) yield exactly two (not necessarily distinct) solutions, each complex number has two, not necessarily distinct,complex square roots. This can be seen in Figure 2. Furthermore, as the above example illustrates, if is a square root then is also one. Therefore if the two complex square roots are not distinct, and so that .
The conclusion is that each nonzero complex number has exactly two distinct complex square roots, and has exactly one square root.
Using Complex Numbers to Solve Equations
Solving Quadratic Equations with Real Coefficients
Consider a general quadratic equation .This can be solved by factorising the equation, completing the square or using the quadratic formula. The first method is usually done by inspection and so extending it to encompass complex roots would requires a degree of intuition about the behaviour of complex numbers that is beyond that which is expected from students. The second and third, however, involve algebraic manipulations that can easily be extended by using complex numbers and performing standard arithmetic calculations on complex numbers. The following example demonstrates how the roots of a quadratic equation with real coefficients can be determined using both the extended versions both of completing the square and using the quadratic formula.
Example 7
Find all complex solutions to the equation .
Solution 7
Method 1 Completing the Square:
Starting with the equation , completing the square yields
Method 2 Using the Quadratic Formula:
Solving Quadratic Equations with Complex Coefficients
Consider again a general quadratic equation . This time, , and are complex numbers. However, this doesn’t change the method that we use to determine the possible value of . Solving by inspection may be a little harder, however completing the square and using the quadratic formula are still equally viable methods.
The following example illustrates how to find the roots of a quadratic equation with complex coefficients.
Example 8
Find all complex solutions to the equation .
Solution 8
Method 1 Completing the Square:
Completing the square on the left hand side of the equation yields
so that and
Let , , real.
Notice how in this step, we don’t automatically jump to ‘let ’. This is because we know that the quantities that we’re most familiar with dealing with the real and imaginary parts of the number being squared. Of course, it is also fine to let , but the working will probably be a little more tedious and a little less familiar.
Then so that and .
The first equation gives
The second equation gives so that and .
or
or
Method 2 Using the Quadratic Formula:
Here the square roots of need to be obtained. This can be done using the same method as the one used above, where all pairs of and satisfying are determined. This leads to solving the simultaneous equations and .
The solutions to the simultaneous equations can be attained by inspection or through algebraic manipulation and yield .
or
or
The Argand Diagram
For every real and there exists a complex number given by . From before, if the real parts and the imaginary parts of two complex numbers are equal, then they are the same number. This means that for every real and there exists a unique complex number given by . In other words, there is a 11 correspondence between ordered pairs of reals and the complex numbers. Extending the idea a little further, there is a 11 correspondence between the complex numbers and the points in the xy plane.
This correspondence immediately suggests a way to diagrammatically represent a complex number : on the xy plane, with x and y coordinates corresponding to and respectively. Such a diagram is known as an ‘Argand diagram’ and the plane on which the points are plotted is sometimes referred to as the ‘Argand plane’ or the ‘complex plane’. The xaxis, along which the value of can be determined, is referred to as the ‘real axis’ and the yaxis is referred to as the ‘imaginary axis’.
The following example demonstrates how to represent complex numbers of the form on an Argand diagram.
Example 9
and
If is restricted by , the value of is unique. If not, there is an infinite family of solutions given by adding ( an integer) to the value of between and .
Note that if (i.e. ), and all values of are possible.
For a compvvWhat are Complex Numbers and why do we need them?
Note: This section is of mathematical interest and students should be encouraged to read it. In particular, it is helpful for them to understand why the complex numbers are not really any more mathematically abstract than the reals. However, knowledge of this section is not required by the current HSC syllabus and is not necessary for an understanding of how to use complex numbers to solve equations.
The set of complex numbers is a number system, just like the set of reals or the set of integers. Like the reals or even the integers, they were developed to close a mathematical ‘gap’ in another number system. So what is this mathematical gap?
Consider the linear equation . This has one solution in the real numbers: .
Now consider the equation . Algebraic manipulation shows that this is equivalent to solving . Since squares of real numbers are nonnegative we would say that this has ‘no real solutions’.
Consider finally a general quadratic equation . To solve this, we use the quadratic formula, which gives us where is the discriminant. If the discriminant is negative, we would again say that the equation has ‘no real solutions’.
What has happened here is that squares of real numbers are always nonnegative. We cannot square a real number and get a negative number. To close this gap, we extend the reals to a number system where squares can also be negative. The easiest way to achieve this is to introduce some number whose square is . This number , is defined by . Then if we want to solve where is some positive real, we get , or . If we put all numbers of the form (where is real) in our new number system, we can now solve any quadratic equation with real coefficients. Numbers of the form ( real) are known as ‘imaginary numbers’.
In order to turn our set of numbers into a proper number system, we want to introduce some operations so that we can do things with these numbers. The two most fundamental operations of any set (or field) of numbers are addition () and multiplication (). We will define these operations properly later. For now, all you need to know is that if you take two real numbers and add them using complex addition, the result is the same as if you added them using real addition. Similarly, if you take two real numbers and multiply them using complex multiplication, the result is the same as if you multiplied them using real multiplication.
Since the real numbers are closed under addition () and multiplication (), we want this to hold true for our new number system too. What this means is that if we take any two numbers in the number system (e.g. and ), we want their sum to be in the number system (closure under addition).We also want their product () to be in the number system (closure under multiplication). If we take the closure of the real and imaginary numbers, we get all numbers of the form ( , real) must be in the new number system. A little bit of complex number arithmetic shows that this is enough to guarantee closure under addition and multiplication.
So now we have a new set of numbers, the complex numbers , where each complex number can be written in the form (where , are real and ). The set of complex numbers is closed under addition and multiplication. Furthermore, each real number is in the set of complex numbers, , so that the real numbers are a subset of the complex numbers (see Figure 1). Finally, any quadratic equation with real coefficients, or even any polynomial with real coefficients, has solutions that can be represented as complex numbers.
Side note: Indeed what makes the complex numbers so powerful is that all degree n polynomials with complex coefficients have n (not necessarily distinct) complex roots. We say that is ‘algebraically closed’.
Figure 1:
This figure shows that the naturals are a subset of the integers, which are a subset of the rationals, which are a subset of the reals, which are a subset of the complex numbers. The set of numbers in the reals which are not rationals are known as the irrationals.
Students should note that whilst the real numbers and the imaginary numbers are both subsets of the complex numbers, there are complex numbers (such as ) which are neither real nor imaginary.
Arithmetic of Complex Numbers
Recall that every complex number is the sum of a real number and imaginary number. We say that has a real part, , and an imaginary part, . If , these are given by:

In the above notation, notice how much a complex number looks like a surd (e.g. compare and ). The only difference is that the number under the square root sign is negative.In fact, when it comes to arithmetic, complex numbers can be treated like surds. This concept is useful when remembering how to add, subtract, multiply or divide complex numbers. Pretend that your complex number is a surd, perform the same operations and everything should work out.
Addition and Subtraction
In order to add two complex numbers, their real and imaginary parts should be added separately. In order to subtract two complex numbers, their real and imaginary parts should be subtracted separately.
Note: Adding is the same as subtracting , and subtracting \ is the same as adding .
Addition:
Or Subtraction: Or 
Example 1If the complex numbers and are given by and , determine: a) b) Solution 1a) b) 
Notice that this is just like adding or subtracting surds:
Multiplication of Complex Numbers
In order to multiply two complex numbers, each number should be treated like a surd and the FOIL method applied as appropriate. Students should note that just as the square of the irrational part of a surd gives a rational number, the square of an imaginary number gives a real number.

Example 2If the complex numbers and are given by and , determine . Solution 2 (applying FOIL) 
Complex Conjugates and their Properties
For a given complex number , its complex conjugate is denoted by and is given by:
Students are required to know how to determine the complex conjugate of a given complex number. The following example illustrates how this is done.
Example 3(HSC 1994 Question 2aii) Solution 3First, express the complex number under the bar as the sum of its real and imaginary components: 
Complex conjugates have a number of nice properties:

Students will eventually be required to prove all these properties (note that proving the 4^{th} and 6^{th} properties requires reading ahead to the next few section). The next example illustrates how one would go about proving such results.
Example 4For any complex numbers and , prove that . Solution 4Let ,

Division of Complex Numbers
One nice thing about complex conjugates is that if a complex number is multiplied with its complex conjugate, the result is a real number:
Notice how this is analogous to multiplying a surd with its conjugate surd, where the result is a rational number.
This result becomes very useful when taking the reciprocals of complex numbers. Just as multiplying the top and bottom of a surd fraction by the conjugate surd of the denominator rationalises the denominator, multiplying top and bottom of a complex number fraction by the complex conjugate of the denominator makes the denominator real.
Similarly, when dividing by a complex number , simply multiply top and bottom by the complex conjugate of and then apply complex multiplication to the numerator.
Example 5If the complex numbers and are given by and , determine . Solution 5

Equality of Complex Numbers
Two complex numbers are equal if and only if their real parts are equal and their imaginary parts are equal.
if and only if AND 
Finding the Square Roots of Real and Complex Numbers
To determine the square root of a real number :
 If , its square roots are the real numbers and .
 If , and are real numbers. Therefore and are imaginary numbers and , . Therefore the square roots of are .
Determining the square root of a complex number is a slightly more complicated process. One way to think about it is that it is equivalent to determining which complex numbers can be squared to give . That is, find all real such that . The general method is as follows:
 Use complex multiplication to obtain the real and imaginary parts of the LHS.
 Since two complex numbers are equal if and only if their real and imaginary parts are equal, equate the real and imaginary parts of the LHS and RHS to obtain two simultaneous equations:
 Comparing real parts gives
 Comparing imaginary parts gives
 Solve for and , either by inspection or by substitution.
The following example demonstrates how both variants of the above method can be used to determine the square roots of a complex number.
Example 6Find all complex solutions to the equation Solution 6Let the solutions be of the form . Then so that and . Variant 1: By inspection, , satisfies these simultaneous equations Checking: and so that is a solution and so that is a solution Variant 2: From the second equation, so that . Substituting into the first equation yields so that and or . Since the second equation has no real solutions, and . Corresponding y can be determined using so that . Therefore and are the solutions to the given equation. Note that the first method, solve by inspection, is a lot shorter and tidier than the second method. Thus if students are able to determine the solutions to the two simultaneous equations by inspection, they are encouraged to use this method. Just to safe, however, they should always include a few lines of checking. The second method has the advantage of providing a series of steps which is guaranteed to yield an answer. If a student cannot easily determine the answer by inspection they should proceed to solve the equations algebraically. 
Students should note that since two simultaneous equations in two variables ( and ) yield exactly two (not necessarily distinct) solutions, each complex number has two, not necessarily distinct,complex square roots. This can be seen in Figure 2. Furthermore, as the above example illustrates, if is a square root then is also one. Therefore if the two complex square roots are not distinct, and so that .
The conclusion is that each nonzero complex number has exactly two distinct complex square roots, and has exactly one square root.
Using Complex Numbers to Solve Equations
Solving Quadratic Equations with Real Coefficients
Consider a general quadratic equation .This can be solved by factorising the equation, completing the square or using the quadratic formula. The first method is usually done by inspection and so extending it to encompass complex roots would requires a degree of intuition about the behaviour of complex numbers that is beyond that which is expected from students. The second and third, however, involve algebraic manipulations that can easily be extended by using complex numbers and performing standard arithmetic calculations on complex numbers. The following example demonstrates how the roots of a quadratic equation with real coefficients can be determined using both the extended versions both of completing the square and using the quadratic formula.
Example 7Find all complex solutions to the equation . Solution 7Method 1 Completing the Square: Starting with the equation , completing the square yields Method 2 Using the Quadratic Formula:

Solving Quadratic Equations with Complex Coefficients
Consider again a general quadratic equation . This time, , and are complex numbers. However, this doesn’t change the method that we use to determine the possible value of . Solving by inspection may be a little harder, however completing the square and using the quadratic formula are still equally viable methods.
The following example illustrates how to find the roots of a quadratic equation with complex coefficients.
Example 8Find all complex solutions to the equation . Solution 8Method 1 Completing the Square: Completing the square on the left hand side of the equation yields
so that and Let , , real. Notice how in this step, we don’t automatically jump to ‘let ’. This is because we know that the quantities that we’re most familiar with dealing with the real and imaginary parts of the number being squared. Of course, it is also fine to let , but the working will probably be a little more tedious and a little less familiar. Then so that and . The first equation gives The second equation gives so that and . or or Method 2 Using the Quadratic Formula:
Here the square roots of need to be obtained. This can be done using the same method as the one used above, where all pairs of and satisfying are determined. This leads to solving the simultaneous equations and . The solutions to the simultaneous equations can be attained by inspection or through algebraic manipulation and yield . or or 
The Argand Diagram
For every real and there exists a complex number given by . From before, if the real parts and the imaginary parts of two complex numbers are equal, then they are the same number. This means that for every real and there exists a unique complex number given by . In other words, there is a 11 correspondence between ordered pairs of reals and the complex numbers. Extending the idea a little further, there is a 11 correspondence between the complex numbers and the points in the xy plane.
This correspondence immediately suggests a way to diagrammatically represent a complex number : on the xy plane, with x and y coordinates corresponding to and respectively. Such a diagram is known as an ‘Argand diagram’ and the plane on which the points are plotted is sometimes referred to as the ‘Argand plane’ or the ‘complex plane’. The xaxis, along which the value of can be determined, is referred to as the ‘real axis’ and the yaxis is referred to as the ‘imaginary axis’.
The following example demonstrates how to represent complex numbers of the form on an Argand diagram.
Example 9 
lex number , the corresponding values of and are given special names.
 The quantity is called the modulus of and is denoted by z.
 All possible values of are called arguments of and are denoted by . The unique value of that is between and is known as the principal argument of and is denoted by .
 Note: The capitalised A is very important: it differentiates the principal argument from other arguments.
 If is not the principal argument then it is incorrect to write .
 If it is still correct to write , but some information is lost in doing so.
 Note also that the complex number 0 does not have a defined principal argument. By convention, 0 does not have an argument.
Modulus:
Arguments: where and Principal Argument: where and 
Just as two complex numbers are equal if and only if their real and imaginary parts are both equal, two complex numbers are equal if and only if their moduli and principal arguments are equal. (The obvious exception is the complex number 0, which does not have a defined principal argument.)
The modulus of a complex number of the form is easily determined. Students tend to struggle more with determining a correct value for the argument. One method is to find the principal argument using a diagram and some trigonometry. The following example illustrates how this can be done.
Example 10For the complex number , find and . Solution 10Let . From the diagram, and . Most students would solve the trigonometric equation by plugging into their calculator. This gives , not necessarily . In this case, we see from checking possible values of that is indeed the value of the principal argument. 
From the relationships between , , and , it can be determined that a complex number can also be written in the form or , where is standard shorthand notation for . This is known as the ‘modulusargument form’, or ‘modarg form’ of a complex number.
Mod – Arg Form: 
The next example demonstrates the process in a typical conversion between Cartesian form and modarg form, and illustrates how to decide on a form to use.
Example 11Let , where and are real numbers and i. Express and in terms of and . ii. Express in the form , where and are real. Solution 11i. ii. This part involves division of complex numbers, which is usually simpler to do using modarg form. However, it presents everything in Cartesian form, so it makes sense to do the question in that form.

Multiplication and Division of Complex Numbers and Properties of the Modulus and Argument
Students should ensure that they are familiar with how to transform between the Cartesian form and the modarg form of a complex number. This is because questions involving complex numbers are often much simpler to solve using one form than the other form. In particular, when complex numbers are multiplied or divided, their moduli and arguments have much simpler and cleaner relationships than their real and imaginary components. This means that in questions involving multiplication and division of complex numbers, it is often recommended to convert to modulusargument form and complete the calculation before converting back (if conversion is necessary).
The relationships that students are required to know how to derive are:
Properties of the Modulus:  Properties of the Argument:

Students should be able to prove all of these relations. The following example illustrates how to prove the first property in each box.
Example 12Let and . a) Express in modulusargument form b) Hence show that and Solution 12a) b) From (a), as required. 
The proof for the second property is similar to that of the first. For positive integers the third property can be derived using the first property and mathematical induction. For negative integers the third property can be derived using and the second property. These proofs are left as an exercise to the reader.
The following worked examples illustrate how the above properties can be used in calculations in modarg form.
Example 13Given , i. Find the argument and modulus of ii. Find the smallest positive integer such that is real Solution 13i. (using the property that )
ii. If is real then for some integer . 
Example 14 (HSC 1997 Q2d)Let and , so that . i. Find and in the form ii. Hence find two distinct ways of writing as the sum , where and are integers and . Solution 14i. ii. We note two interesting things given in the question: we want to find , where 65 is in the denominator of all the terms in and , and . This immediately makes us think to use the moduli of and . By the properties of the modulus, and Similarly . 
Example 15i. If , show that ii. , are complex numbers such that . Solution 15i. We wish to prove that . These groups of terms nearly look like the double angle formulas for and respectively so we made the necessary adjustments ii. The given expression is ugly, so we want to simplify it as much as possible before plugging in any expressions. We note first that the expression on top factorises:
as required. 
Geometric Relationships between points on an Argand Diagram
There are nice geometrical relationships between points representing certain complex numbers. In particular, students are required to recognise the relationship between the point representing a complex number and the points representing the complex numbers , ( real) and . These can be summarised as follows:
Students are not required to know the proofs of these properties. However, the proofs have been included as they help to illustrate some basic principles used in graphing complex numbers and relationships between complex numbers.
Relationship between Points Representing and
If is represented by the point then is represented by the point . This is the reflection of over the xaxis.
Similarly, if is represented by the point then
and is represented by the point , which is again obviously the reflection of over the xaxis.
Relationship between Points Representing and ( is real)
If is represented by the point then is represented by the point .
Similarly, if is represented by the point then is represented by the point .
This means that the vector is the dilation of the vector about the origin with factor .
That is:
 If , stretch out by a factor of
 If , stretch out by a factor of and rotate it by about the origin
 If then the point representing is the point
Relationship between Points Representing and
If is represented by the point then is represented by the point . This means that the vector is the vector rotated anticlockwise radians, or , about the origin, since its magnitude is the same but its angle of rotation is radians larger.
Note that in this case, since the calculations involve multiplying complex numbers, it is a lot simpler to use modearg form. If were instead represented in Cartesian form, then represented by the point and is represented by the point .The relationship between these points is not as immediately obvious.
The following example demonstrates how the relationships between the points representing , , ( real) and can be used to determine the complex numbers represented by certain points in terms of the complex numbers represented by other points.
Example 16(i) Let be a square on an Argand diagram where is the origin. The points and represent the complex numbers and respectively. Find the complex number represented by . (ii) The square is now rotated about through in an anticlockwise direction to . Find the complex numbers represented by the points , and . Solution 16a) A good approach to an Argand diagram question always begins with a diagram. Diagrams help you to see properties or make links that you otherwise would have missed. b) Again, start with a diagram
represents , represents and represents 
Representing Complex Numbers as Vectors on an Argand Diagram
We showed before that there is a 11 correspondence between the complex numbers and the points in the xy plane, so that each complex number can be represented by a unique point in the complex plane. This means that there is also a 11 correspondence between the complex numbers and the vectors , where is the origin and is a point in the complex plane.
We represent each complex number by the vector , where . From the definition of the modulus and argument, we see that this means that:
 The length of the vector is the distance from to the origin, which is the modulus
i.e.  The direction of the vector is defined by the angle from the positive x axis to the ray , which is the argument. This means that the direction of the vector is uniquely defined by .
So we see that this vector representation is similar to the Argand diagram representation. What this representation adds to the point representation is that vectors can be moved about, whereas points are fixed in the plane. Figure 3 illustrates this concept. This means that a lot of geometric properties (and hence algebraic properties) can be determined by rearranging the vectors.
Figure 3  Although vectors , and all represent the complex number and the vectors and both represent the complex number , they are placed in different positions on the complex plane. In particular, vectors and are placed tail to tail, whilst vectors and are placed tip to tail. These vectors are therefore easier to relate than say, and . 
Constructing Vector Representations of Complex Numbers
Given the vector representations of two complex numbers and , students are required to construct the vectors , , and . This can be done by considering the geometrical properties of the vectors.
Two vectors, and , can be added either by using the triangle method or by using the parallelogram method. Each method is equally viable and in different situations one method will be more useful than the other.
The triangle method, or the tiptotail method, involves placing the tip of the vector at the tail of the vector . The vector pointing from the remaining tail to the remaining tip, i.e. from the tail of to the tip of , gives the vector .
The parallelogram method involves placing the tails of each vector at the same spot. If the parallelogram with and as two of its adjacent sides is constructed, the vector along the diagonal from the tails to the opposite vertex gives the vector .
Note that the vector is the vector with the same magnitude as but in the opposite direction.
Note also that subtracting a vector is the same as adding the vector .
Constructing the Point Representing from the Points Representing and
Given the points representing and , the vectors representing and with tail at the origin can be obtained by joining the points with the origin. Since the vectors representing and are placed tail to tail, the parallelogram method can then be used to construct the vector representing with tail at the origin. The tip of this vector gives the point representing .
Students must include:·

Constructing Vectors Representing and from Vectors Representing and
Given the vectors and representing and respectively, vectors representing and with tip at the origin are given by and respectively. Since and are placed tip to tail, the triangle method can then be used to construct a vector representing by adding and . The same method holds for constructing a vector representing .
Students must include:·

Constructing the Point Representing from the Points Representing and
Suppose the points representing and are given by and . Denote by the point . Use equal angles to construct the similar triangles and . Then is the point representing .
Students must include:

To see why this is true, consider and the angle from the positive x axis to the ray , .
By similar triangles, so that .
Again by similar triangles,
so that .
Together, these tell us that is the point representing .
Triangle Inequality
Students are expected to be able to prove the triangle inequality for the moduli of complex numbers:
The geometrical proof of this given in the following worked example and demonstrates one application of vector representations.
Example 17Given two arbitrary complex numbers and , prove that (where is the modulus of ). Solution 17

Worked Examples involving Vector Representations of Complex Numbers
HSC questions do not simply ask students to draw a memorised diagram. Students are often required to synthesise the information embedded in the above techniques, such as by identifying the third side of the triangle , as the vector , or even using algebra to determine other geometric properties. The following examples illustrate a few applications of the techniques presented in this section.
Example 18Let and be two complex numbers, where and is defined by and (i) On an Argand diagram plot the points and representing the complex numbers and respectively. (ii) Plot the points and represented by the complex numbers and respectively. Indicate any geometric relationships between the four points , , and . Solution 18Graphs for (i) and (ii):
(i) Since and are given in Cartesian and modarg form respectively, the points were plotted using those respective forms. This is fine, as long as for the Cartesian form both the x and y coordinates are specified, and for the modarg form both the modulus and argument are specified. (ii) By the triangle rule for vector subtraction the vector is equal to . Therefore the point is such that , that is, is a parallelogram. 
Example 19
Solution 19(i) The proof follows the same lines as the proof for . (ii) The point can be obtained using the parallelogram rule for addition:
We guess that the previous parts of the question should help us to answer this question. 
Example 20In an Argand Diagram, , and represent the complex numbers , , and respectively.(i) Describe the point which represents . (ii) Deduce that if , then is a parallelogram. Solution 20(i) First, we draw a diagram. Since we know how to find the point that represents we find that, call it and then we know that the midpoint of is the point that we want. (ii) We want to use part (i) to give us some information about and . From part (i) the point that represents is the midpoint of . Since we want to relate with we note that similarly the point that represents is the midpoint of . 
De Moivre’s Theorem
De Moivre’s Theorem states that for all integers :
This result is equivalent to .
The result is trivial for and can be proven for positive integers by mathematical induction, using the expansions of and . It can then be extended to the negative integers using complex division and . The proof is left as an exercise to the reader.
The most obvious application of De Moivre’s theorem is in calculating integer powers of complex numbers. For any complex number , De Moivre’s theorem tells us that . This means that integer powers of a complex number can be easily calculated using De Moivre’s theorem and the modulusargument form of the number. The following example illustrates how to calculate the integer power of a complex number.
Example 21Express in modulusargument form: (i) (ii) , where is a positive integer. Solution 21(i) (ii) by de Moivre’s theorem 
De Moivre’s theorem is actually a lot more powerful than it looks. As was just demonstrated, directly comparing the two sides of the equation provides a direct formula for powers of complex numbers. However, the real and imaginary components can also be compared separately. Doing so provides an efficient way of calculating and as polynomials in and . The following example illustrates how this is done.
Example 22se De Moivre’s thorem to express and in terms of and . Hence show that Solution 22Since we want to express and in terms of and , it makes sense to use De Moivre’s theorem for .
Since we want our answer to be in terms of we note that so we divide through by to put all the powers of on the bottom of each term.

De Moivre’s theorem is also useful because it provides an efficient way of expressing large powers of and as a linear combination of the sines and cosines of multiples of . This is because if we let :
The next example demonstrates how De Moivre’s theorem can be used to calculate large powers of and .
Example 23If show that and hence show that Solution 23Let . Then (by De Moivre’s theorem) Students might then be tempted to go straight for . This, unfortunately, yields two powers of and only one cosine term. It seems better to express in terms of multiple powers of that can then be grouped together and converted to cosines of multiples of . The following method is the general method for calculating large powers of and . From this, we know that

The Roots of Unity
The n^{th} roots of unity are the complex numbers such that . These can be determined using de Moivre’s theorem:
Let . Then . Since two nonzero complex numbers can only be equal if their moduli are equal, so that . This gives , and , . This yields distinct values for corresponding to . Any other value of yields a value of that gives the same sine and cosine values as one of the n values of specified above.
Therefore the n n^{th} roots of unity are given by .
Roots of Unity:where 
This shows that n^{th} roots of unity can be expressed on the Argand diagram as vectors of length 1 radiating from the origin, spaced equally around the unit circle. This means that they form the vertices of a regular ngon. Students will often be asked to demonstrate their understanding of this through graphing the n^{th} roots on an Argand diagram. For example, the cube roots of unity can be represented as the vertices of an equilateral triangle as follows:
Students must include:

The roots can be found in the form by converting from modulusargument form.
The n^{th} roots of can similarly be determined using de Moivre’s theorem:
Let . Then .
, and and , .
Where 
Again, the roots must be equally spaced around the unit circle. However, they look a little different to the n^{th} roots of unity. One way to think about it is that whereas n^{th} roots of unity begin at 1 and move around the circle anticlockwise with a step angle of , n^{th} roots of unity begin at 1 and move around the circle anticlockwise with a step angle of . Another way to think about it is that each n^{th} root of 1 is of the form , which is one of the n^{th} roots of unity rotated anticlockwise about the origin by an angle of .
Polynomials and the Roots of
One of the more difficult applications of complex number theory involves using the algebra and ideas expressed in de Moivre’s theorem and the derivation of expression for the n^{th} roots of to solve polynomials. These questions can usually be broken down into little steps by using complex number theory and ideas involved in solving polynomials, such as sum and product of roots. The nice thing is that HSC questions will often help students to separate the question into simple steps, or even present the steps and links as part of the problem statement. However, since this is not always the case, students should acquaint themselves with the various processes involved in breaking down questions.
Often, smaller steps can be obtained by considering the type of information given to them in the problem statement and the type of information that they needs to be extract. The following examples illustrate how this can be done.
Example 24
showing that the n^{th} roots of unity can be written as powers of one of its roots, dividing through by to get an equation whose roots are all complex and then using a relation to do with polynomials or complex numbers with magnitude 1 to get some new information.Let (i) Show that is a solution of , where is an integer. (ii) Prove that (iii) Hence show that Solution 24(i) To show that is a solution of , all we have to do is plug it in and show that . by De Moivre’s Theorem Hence , where is an integer, is a solution of . (ii) Method 1:
(iii) We want to relate cosines, which are real numbers, with powers of , which are complex numbers. To do this, we use one of the niftier consequences of de Moivre’s theorem:
Step 3: Simplify this expression using results from previous parts until we get to the required result What we’ve done here is make the result easier to expand (we think that we will have to expand, since part (ii) looks very much like an expanded result). Now it’s just a matter of expanding and hoping for the best. We expand and lo and behold, we get the long side of the equation in part (ii) and we can just replace it with and everything falls out. 
This problem demonstrates a type of problem that many students will shy away from: one involving not 1, not 2, but n variables. The trick is to deal with each variable separately, or to work patiently through sums, preferably using summation notation. Students will see that this question, as scary as it looks, is actually a lot easier than the previous one.Let the points , …, represent the n^{th} roots of unity, , , …, , and suppose represents any complex number such that . (i) Prove that . (ii) Show that for . (iii) Prove that Solution 25(i) We want to know the value of , where , , …, are the n^{th} roots of unity. This in itself already tells us something: they are the n solutions to some equation, and we want to find their sum. If this equation is a polynomial, we know right away what the sum of the solutions is. So let’s consider this equation. (ii) To determine what is, we first have to take a look at what is meant by these points. represents the complex number . represents the complex number . Therefore by the triangle method for vector subtraction, represents and . (iii) Before we dive into summation, let’s see if we can simplify each term in the expression any more.
(since is independent of ) 
Sketching Curves and Regions in the Complex Plane
Sometimes it is useful to represent the complex solutions to a given equation or inequality in graphical form. In particular, there are a few standard curves that students are expected to know how to sketch. In the HSC, the complex equations describing these curves are often combined or turned into inequalities to create more involved questions. However, these curves and regions are quite simple to sketch if students have a firm understanding of the elementary curves that they are comprised of.
When determining the nature of the following standard curves, a number of algebraic and geometric approaches can be taken.If using an algebraic approach, students should ensure that they are able to obtain a Cartesian equation for the locus, and able to translate this equation into a geometric description.If using the geometric approach, students should ensure that they are able to translate the geometric properties describing the locus into algebraic form, through a Cartesian equation.
Solutions to the Equations and
Algebraic approach
The solutions of these equations are given by lines parallel to the y axis and x axis respectively:
If , .If .
Solutions to Equations of the Form
Algebraic approach
Since the equations involve the subtraction of complex numbers,the simpler algebraic approach should involve expressing the complex numbers as the sum of their real and imaginary parts.
Let , and .
which is of the form
, a straight line!
Geometric approach
This seems like a remarkably simple result for some notsosimple equations. However it is quite easily explained using a geometric interpretation. The solutions describe the locus of points that are equidistant from two fixed points in the plane: the point representing and the point representing . If a possible value of is represented by the point , then is isosceles with so that the altitude from to bisects . That is, lies on the perpendicular bisector of , which is a straight line. Furthermore, any point on the perpendicular bisector satisfies so that the locus of points is the perpendicular bisector.
To plot the perpendicular bisector of , all that is required is to find a point on the line and the gradient of the line.
A point on the line is given by the midpoint of . The gradient is the one perpendicular to the gradient of .
These give .
Students must include:

Solutions to Equations of the Form
Algebraic approach
Again, since the equations involve the subtraction of complex numbers, the simpler algebraic approach should involve expressing the complex numbers as the sum of their real and imaginary parts.
Let and .
The locus of therefore traces out a circle in the complex plane center and radius .
Geometric approach
The solutions describe the locus of points that are a fixed distance from the point representing the complex number . Thus the locus of traces out a circle in the complex plane center and radius . This has equation .
Students must include:

Solutions to Equations of the Form
The graph is a ray starting with an open circle on the point representing the complex number and pointing in a direction that is anticlockwise from the positive xaxis.
Students must include:

Geometric approach
Consider the vector representation of complex numbers, where is the angle from the positive xaxis to the ray . Since is the vector pointing from the point representing to the point representing , if this makes an angle of with the positive xaxis then the ray is radians anticlockwise from the positive xaxis. Similarly if is represented by an arbitrary point on the ray with tail and angle from positive xaxis, then as required. At or is undefined so that there is an open circle at that point.
Equations involving both and
Students will often be asked to graph equations involving both and . Cartesian equations can usually be obtained by substituting and .
Worked Examples involving Sketching Curves and Regions in the Complex Plane
Sketching the solutions to inequalities is not any more difficult than sketching the solutions to equalities. The equality case creates a curve, or boundary, that splits the complex plane into two sections. The inequality sign means that everything on one side of the boundary is part of the region and everything on the other side is not.
The following examples illustrate how compositions of elementary curves can be used to graph regions in the complex plane that are described by a number of equations and inequalities.
Example 26Sketch the region where the inequalities and Solution 26The trick with sketching composite regions is to sketch each region separately, and see which parts of the plane lie in both regions.
Taking the intersection of these two regions yields: 
Example 27On an Argand diagram, shade in the region determined by the inequalities and . Solution 27
